Skip to main content
Download PDF

Primary care during COVID-19 pandemic - a survey to establish clinical needs and lessons learned in infectious respiratory diseases in Spain

BMC Primary Care volume 24, Article number: 202 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed gaps and areas of need in health care systems. General practitioners (GPs) play a crucial role in the response to COVID-19 and other respiratory infectious diseases (e.g., influenza). Knowing the current flow of these patients and the real needs of GPs is necessary to implement new therapeutic and diagnostic strategies. We sought to learn about the flow of COVID-19 and flu patients in Spanish primary health centers and understand the training needs in both the diagnosis and treatment of these diseases.

Methods

A total of 451 regionally representative GPs completed an online survey between January and February 2022.

Results

Most of the GPs had available infection containment measures (79%) and access to point-of-care (POC) rapid diagnostic testing (81%) in their centers. The availability of on-the-day diagnostic tests for COVID-19 was higher than that for influenza (80% vs. 20%). Most GPs referred 1 of 10 COVID-19 or flu patients with moderate to severe disease to the emergency department (80% and 90%, respectively). Training/knowledge was considered good regarding diagnostic tests and vaccines (85%) but null or low regarding antivirals (60%) and monoclonal antibodies (80%).

Conclusions

This survey identified the conditions of Spanish GPs in terms of the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19 and flu patients. Respondents’ comments suggested that quite radical system-level adjustments are needed to allow GPs to capitalize on the potential benefits of POC tests for diagnosis, reduction of referrals, and monitoring of these diseases.

Peer Review reports

Background

Primary care is the first line of defense for the health care system during a pandemic. General practitioners (GPs) work with other health care professionals, allowing cohesion in the health care system and protecting patients and communities [1].

The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed gaps and areas of need in health systems worldwide [2]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), primary care plays a major role in the COVID-19 response [3]. GPs play a crucial role in the struggle against the pandemic as the first point of contact for possibly infected patients and are responsible for the short- and long-term follow-up care of most COVID-19 patients [1]. In addition to their role in monitoring COVID-19 patients, GPs have a relevant function in the screening and monitoring of patients with other infectious respiratory diseases, such as influenza. Moreover, despite COVID-19 vaccination, simultaneous outbreaks of COVID-19 and flu might overwhelm health systems [4]. By performing early diagnoses and differentiating patients with respiratory symptoms from those with COVID-19 or influenza, GPs reduce the demand for hospital services and the economic burden in health care. The arrival of the influenza season increases the need for prevention, diagnosis, management, and capacity across health care centers. Influenza leads to substantial direct and indirect health care burdens, which vary depending on the health status of the infected individual and the treatment setting [5]. A careful approach is needed to prevent health services from being overwhelmed by a surge in demand that could exceed capacity. Point-of-care (POC) testing presents new possibilities for the management of influenza patients presenting to health care providers with acute respiratory symptoms [6]. Following Schols et al., the international definition of POC testing is testing to support clinical decision-making that is performed by a qualified member of the practice staff near the patient and on any part of the patient’s body or its derivatives during or very close to the time of consultation to help the patient and physician decide upon the most suitable approach; the testing results should be known at the time of clinical decision-making [7]. Accuracy rates of POC tests are approximately 80% for identifying COVID-19 infections [8]. Hence, improving POC testing, including both molecular and rapid antigen testing, can potentially support GPs in quickly identifying infectious and noninfectious respiratory diseases (e.g., COVID-19 and flu), inform patient triaging, and improve clinical management [9].

Although the role of primary care and GPs in health emergencies such as COVID-19 and flu is well known, different studies have revealed gaps involving primary care in pandemic preparedness and response planning [10]. Kierkegaard et al. performed a survey among GPs in England that identified that GPs’ knowledge of POC testing influences their degree of trust, uncertainty, and perception of the risk of POC testing. Moreover, in this study, GPs expressed concerns about funding, occupational exposure, and workload in providing POC testing [9].

To successfully manage the current COVID-19 crisis and new future pandemics, we need to understand the impact and challenges faced by GPs in Spain. In this study, we aimed to investigate the challenges encountered and solutions implemented by GPs when they faced SARS-CoV-2 and influenza patients in Spanish primary health care centers and to understand the training needs from both diagnosis and treatment perspectives.

Methods

This paper reports on data from an online survey. GPs answered questions on diagnostic tools, management of suspected cases of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza and training in new treatment and diagnostic strategies. Scientific endorsement was obtained from all the scientific societies that participated in this study [Sociedad Española de Médicos de Atención Primaria (SEMERGEN), Sociedad Española de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria (SEMFYC) y Sociedad Española de Médicos Generales y de Familia (SEMG)]. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki to guarantee the anonymity of all participants.

Participant selection and recruitment

All GP members of Fundación iO and 3 Spanish societies (SEMERGEN, SEMFYC and SEMG) were invited to participate in the online survey in February 2022 through the communication channels of each society (newsletter, email, etc.). Reminders were sent out in March and April 2022. The survey was closed on May 13, 2022. The URL leading to the online survey was sent to the participants with all the following information: the aim and importance of this study, the voluntary nature of participation, data security and anonymity of the survey. Survey completion was interpreted as informed consent to the anonymous use of the data. Participants did not receive incentives or funding to participate.

Survey questions

The online survey had 19 closed-ended questions without open fields or adverse effect questions. The survey was on the diagnostic tools, patient referrals, patient flow at the primary care centers in Spain and training needs. The survey questions are provided in Table 1. The questions were written by Linares M with feedback and validation from 25 primary care experts. Based on the comments from the experts, Linares M wrote the final questions.

Table 1 Wording of closed-ended questions in the online survey
Full size table

Data analysis

No formal sample size was calculated. The sample size was defined as the total number of GPs who responded to the questionnaire. A descriptive analysis was performed. Medians and percentages were calculated for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. The data were managed with SPSS v20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Sample characteristics

A total of 451 regionally representative GPs from 15 autonomous communities completed the online survey (1.67% response rate). The autonomous communities that were more represented as locations of practice were Andalucía and Madrid, with 253 and 54 questionnaires completed, respectively. The sociodemographic characteristics of the sample are displayed in Table 2. Participants comprised mostly women (55%) and had an average age of 52 years.

Table 2 Sample characteristics
Full size table

Infection containment measures and point of care (POC)

Most of the GPs (79%) reported having infection containment measures at their primary care unit to respond to patients with respiratory symptoms (defined as a group of measures that prevent and contain the spread of infectious diseases in the centers for the management of patients with respiratory symptoms, including hand hygiene, personal protective equipment, contact and airborne precautions, etc.). Moreover, 81% of the GPs confirmed fast access to POC diagnostic tests. Almost 20% of the GPs noted that more than half of the patients who attended primary care centers had undergone a COVID-19 diagnostic self-test prior to the consultation.

Diagnostic capacity

Most of the GPs (95%) had antigen COVID-19 diagnostic tests available, followed by PCR (81%) and serology (66%). On the other hand, only 27% and 18.5% of GPs had access to influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) diagnostic tests, respectively. All the data related to access to diagnostic tests are described in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Diagnosis capacity of GPs at Spanish primary center care

Full size image

Time to diagnosis

Most of the GPs (53.4%) could diagnose COVID-19 within minutes. Only a few GPs had access to a diagnostic test for flu or respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and could make a diagnosis of the infection on the same day (20 and 11%, respectively). Data on time to diagnosis are presented in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Time for diagnosis by GP from COVID-19, Flu or RSV

Full size image

Patient referral

More than 80% of GPs referred 1 of 10 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who had a risk of moderate to severe disease (with comorbidities) to emergency departments. A similar scenario was observed for the flu, with 90% of GPs referring patients. The principal cause of referring a patient with COVID-19 or flu to the emergency room was the presence of symptomatology (60.8%), followed by stable referral criteria (20%), presence of comorbidities (18.5%) and finally the need to be seen by another specialist (0.8%).

Emergency and hospital care relationships

Only 21% of primary care doctors declared that they had a good or excellent relationship with emergency or hospital care. Most of the GPs considered the relationships with these health care professionals normal (58%) or poor (12%). For 9% of GPs, this contact was nonexistent.

Antiviral treatment

In the opinion of 65% of the GPs, antiviral prescriptions against COVID-19 are an effective treatment for patients at the primary care evaluation. A similar scenario was observed for flu (57%). Most of the GPs (77%) considered that in the future, it will be possible to prescribe antivirals to COVID-19- and flu-positive patients in primary care.

GP training/self-knowledge

More than 85% of GPs reported that they knew about diagnostic tests or vaccines (Fig. 4). However, 60% and 80% of GPs stated that they lack self-knowledge of antivirals or monoclonal antibodies, respectively (Fig. 3). Most of the GPs considered that their COVID-19 management was satisfactory (7.28 on a 10-point scale).

Fig. 3
figure 3

GP training and self-knowledge

Full size image

Criteria for improvement of primary care

A great proportion of GPs (43%) stated that having more diagnostic resources at primary care centers will help them perform their job. Having more experience (by getting trained on diagnostic techniques such as diagnostic tests, antivirals, monoclonal antibodies and vaccines) and improving their relationship with other HCPs can help their performance, according to 28% and 15% of the surveyed GPs, respectively (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Criteria to improve primary care

Full size image

Discussion

This study describes the current situation in primary care regarding the diagnosis and treatment of respiratory diseases through the perspective of 451 GPs from 15 autonomous communities (regions) in Spain.

GPs are placed at the center of the health care system since they have a vital role in emergencies [1]. They can easily assess and manage infectious diseases such as seasonal influenza [11] and have widely recognized involvement in pandemic preparedness [12]. Indeed, this study showed that less than 10% of patients diagnosed either with COVID-19 or flu with moderate to severe risk (with comorbidities) were referred to hospitals by most GPs. This is in accordance with other studies that showed that access to a GP is associated with lower emergency department use [13]. In contrast, patients without a GP are more likely to go to the emergency department and have a higher proportion of nonurgent consultations [13].

Even so, GPs experience many challenges in fulfilling their role [1]. Particularly, as the pandemic decelerates, COVID-19-related complications must be addressed alongside robust control of influenza infections to avoid outbreaks that can lead to increased bed occupancy in hospitals and considerable financial implications [14]. Therefore, better approaches to sustain primary care services need to be considered.

This survey showed that not all GPs had infection containment measures at their primary care center (79%) to treat patients with respiratory symptoms. Unfortunately, this number may be lower as the pandemic ends and media interest in the prevention of respiratory diseases decreases. Most of the GPs (95%) had access to COVID-19 antigen tests, 81% to PCR, and 66% to COVID-19 serology tests. A possible explanation for these results is that POC antigen tests are authorized by the WHO and are particularly useful in case PCR results are not available in a timely manner or in case of an overwhelmed health care system [15], which can happen in Spain. A total of 27% of GPs responded that they had access to influenza diagnostic tests, and only 18.3% had access to diagnostic tests against RSV. For influenza, accurate and rapid molecular test platforms have become available in recent years, with a substantial impact on reducing nosocomial transmission, reducing the use of routine blood tests, blood cultures, and chest radiography by 20%, 18%, and 19%, respectively, and improving patient flow by adopting better infection control measures [16,17,18]. However, the survey demonstrated that the clinical diagnosis of viruses with public health impacts, such as influenza and RSV, continues to present a challenge for most physicians in Spain and needs to be better integrated into primary care [19, 20]. In response to this, sentinel syndromic surveillance systems will be set up in Spain for influenza, RSV, and SARS-CoV-2; this will involve the provision of new testing pathways, the use of PCR tests rather than antigenic tests, the reestablishment of regional networks, and the establishments of new networks. Finally, only 57% of GPs responded that they had access to chest radiography, and an even smaller percentage responded that they had access to CRP tests (Fig. 1), which can have critical implications. Chest radiography is an important diagnostic method for evaluation of the airways, pulmonary parenchyma and vessels, mediastinum, heart, pleura and chest wall that can help to ameliorate patient management, as shown by Speets et al. [21]. On the other hand, CRP levels that are positively correlated with the severity of different infections have been recently described as a good predictor of COVID-19 severity [22]. Not only can CRP levels predict COVID-19-associated severe pneumonia early [23], but they were also shown to be elevated in patients with a poor COVID-19 prognosis, in patients who dies from COVID-19-related causes, and in patients with additional COVID-19-related radiological lesions and tissue damage [22, 23].

POC testing enables GPs to make more trustworthy decisions and to perform quicker interventions, increasing efficiency (e.g., improving the quality of antibiotic prescriptions and reducing the number of prescriptions) and consequently benefiting morbidity and mortality rates [7, 24]. Although 81% of the GPs reported that they had instant access to POC tests, the above results showed a lack of access to some of the most important tests (Fig. 1), which can indicate that the POC concept is not very well understood among GPs. This may be due to the rapid emergence and evolution of POC tests in the last few years, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic [25].

The survey further demonstrated a high frequency of rapid COVID-19 self-tests performed by patients prior to consultation, highlighting their high availability at local pharmacies as a way to support Spanish primary care. However, the timing from diagnosis to results can still be an issue, as 2% of GPs reported a period of 2 to 5 days to have the results for a COVID-19 diagnosis (Fig. 2). A worse scenario was observed for influenza and RSV detection, with only 20 and 11% of the GPs having the diagnostic results on the same day, respectively.

Kierkegaard et al. showed that GPs’ knowledge of POC tests influences their degree of confidence in POC test use [9]. Here, 85% of the participants were considered to have satisfactory knowledge about vaccines and diagnostic tests (Fig. 3). The results showed that 65% and 57% of the GPs considered that antiviral prescriptions against COVID-19 and flu, respectively, were an effective treatment for patients in primary care. In contrast, more than 50% of GPs reported having poor knowledge of antivirals and monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 or influenza infection. These treatments given at an early stage of the infection can substantially reduce the risk of hospitalization and death among high-risk patients [26]. Therefore, facilitating better training in diagnostic techniques for Spanish GPs could be an effective approach to improving the treatment of patients with respiratory infections in primary care. In addition, further analysis should be performed to underpin major barriers to more efficient testing and develop future guidelines, such as the reinforcement of POC testing in highly populated regions to decentralize testing from hospitals, appropriate training for all health care providers, not only GPs, and the establishment of testing regulations (e.g., POC testing in combination with previous self-testing only for high-risk patients, elderly individuals, and health care professionals). Moreover, an additional measure to reduce the economic burden may rely on investing in diagnostic tests that can detect various infections all at once (e.g., the FilmArray® Respiratory Panel) [27].

The postpandemic health system in Spain faces an enormous challenge in reforming the organization of the national health system to respond to patients’ health needs. However, this can only be achieved by strengthening primary health care and improving the relationship with hospitals/emergency rooms to guarantee adequate conditions for GP performance [28]. In this survey, only 21% of primary care doctors declared that they had an excellent/good relationship with emergency or hospital care providers. To improve this interaction, the Spanish government recently announced the creation of a Public Health Agency. By preparing efficient plans for alerts, risks, and current or emerging threats, this governmental agency will perform crucial roles such as public health surveillance, preparation and response to future emergencies, advice and evaluation assessment of international public health policies, and health risk communication to better respond to societal health care needs and possibly reinforce POC testing strategies [29]. Moreover, the Spanish government recently approved 172 million euros to finance the Action Plan for Primary and Community Care 2022–2023. The investment will certainly increase the resolution capacity in primary care and allow the acquisition of equipment, as well as optimize administrative processes and promote the quality of care [30].

Although the number of respondents was high (451 GPs, the largest number in a study on primary care in Spain), this study presents some limitations. The present study examined a convenient sample from a limited list of all registered general practitioners in IO foundations and 3 Spanish societies. However, the sample represented solely 1% of the GPs in Spain [31]. Additionally, the level of knowledge of each GP about tests and treatments for respiratory diseases was underexplored and may not have represented the overall knowledge of the GP population. Additionally, the survey questions were highly subjective, and future efforts should be considered to adopt a more objective questionnaire (e.g., years of experience with diagnostic techniques; how many tests performed per day). Another caveat of this study is that in the timeline during which the questionnaire was open (2 months), several aspects related to the COVID-19 pandemic situation changed (e.g., changes in the number of positive COVID-19 patients), which could have introduced some bias to the results. Finally, in terms of the percentage of patients referred to hospitals, there was no information regarding the disposition rate from the emergency department. Future studies should include the number of patients referred together with the number of patients admitted vs. sent home.

Conclusions

After the major role of primary care was emphasized during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is necessary to have a strategic plan that allows investment in primary care infrastructure and needs. Infection containment measures at primary care centers, the availability of diagnostic resources for respiratory diseases and the overall level of expertise on new treatments should be increased to improve GPs’ management of patients with respiratory symptomatology. Moreover, it is critical to take into account GPs’ knowledge and opinions about diagnostic and treatment strategies for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza to enable appropriate implementation strategies. Future research should explore appropriate contexts for POC test use and implementation in primary care.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Van Poel E, Vanden Bussche P, Klemenc-Ketis Z, Willems S. How did general practices organize care during the COVID-19 pandemic: the protocol of the cross-sectional PRICOV-19 study in 38 countries. BMC Prim Care. 2022;23(1):11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Aparicio Betancourt M, Duarte-Diaz A, Vall-Roque H, Seils L, Orrego C, Perestelo-Pérez L et al. Global Healthcare needs related to COVID-19: an evidence map of the First Year of the pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(16).

  3. World Health Organization [Internet]. Role of primary care in the COVID-19 response. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331921

  4. Bellizzi S, Panu Napodano CM, Pinto S, Pichierri G. COVID-19 and seasonal influenza: the potential 2021-22 Twindemic. Vaccine. 2022;40(24):3286–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Jones WA, Castro RC, Masters HL, Carrico R. Influenza Management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a review of recent innovations in antiviral therapy and relevance to primary care practice. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2021;5(6):974–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Dickson EM, Zambon M, Pebody R, de Lusignan S, Elliot AJ, Ellis J et al. Do point-of-care tests (POCTs) offer a new paradigm for the management of patients with influenza? Euro Surveill. 2020;25(44).

  7. Schols AMR, Dinant GJ, Hopstaken R, Price CP, Kusters R, Cals JWL. International definition of a point-of-care test in family practice: a modified e-Delphi procedure. Fam Pract. 2018;35(4):475–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kalia R, Kaila R, Kahar P, Khanna D. Laboratory and Point-of-care testing for COVID-19: a review of recent developments. Cureus. 2022;14(8):e28530.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kierkegaard PHT, Yang Y, Lee J, Hayward G, Philip J, Turner A, Joy Allen, et al. Primary care and point-of-care testing during a pandemic: Clinician’s perspectives on integrating rapid testing for COVID-19 into the primary care pathway. medRxiv. 2021. 04.13.21255347.

  10. Eisele M, Pohontsch NJ, Scherer M. Strategies in primary care to face the SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 pandemic: an online survey. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:613537.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ali MK, Shah DJ, Del Rio C. Preparing primary care for COVID-20. J Gen Intern Med. 2020.

  12. Rohilla J, Tak P, Jhanwar S, Hasan S. Primary care physician’s approach for mental health impact of COVID-19. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9(7):3189–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Stein AT, Harzheim E, Costa M, Cseh B. The relevance of continuity of care: a solution for the chaos in the emergency services. Fam Pract. 2002;19(2):207–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Alvarez-Lerma F, Marin-Corral J, Vila C, Masclans JR, Loeches IM, Barbadillo S, et al. Characteristics of patients with hospital-acquired influenza A (H1N1)pdm09 virus admitted to the intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect. 2017;95(2):200–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. World Health Organization [Internet]. Antigen-detection in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection using rapid immunoassays. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/antigen-detection-in-the-diagnosis-of-sars-cov-2infectionusing-rapid-immunoassay2020 [.

  16. Youngs J, Marshall B, Farragher M, Whitney L, Glass S, Pope C, et al. Implementation of influenza point-of-care testing and patient cohorting during a high-incidence season: a retrospective analysis of impact on infection prevention and control and clinical outcomes. J Hosp Infect. 2019;101(3):276–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. de Lusignan S, Hoang U, Liyanage H, Tripathy M, Yonova I, Byford R, et al. Integrating molecular point-of-care testing for influenza into primary care: a mixed-methods feasibility study. Br J Gen Pract. 2020;70(697):e555–e62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee JJ, Verbakel JY, Goyder CR, et al. The clinical utility of point-of-care tests for Influenza in Ambulatory Care: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69(1):24–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Peltola V, Reunanen T, Ziegler T, Silvennoinen H, Heikkinen T. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of influenza in outpatient children. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(8):1198–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bagaria J, Jansen T, Marques DF, Ananthakumar T, Tan PS, Turner PJ et al. Rapidly adapting primary care sentinel surveillance across seven countries in Europe for COVID-19 in the first half of 2020: strengths, challenges, and lessons learned. Euro Surveill. 2022;27(26).

  21. Speets AM, van der Graaf Y, Hoes AW, Kalmijn S, Sachs AP, Rutten MJ, et al. Chest radiography in general practice: indications, diagnostic yield and consequences for patient management. Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56(529):574–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Yitbarek GY, Walle Ayehu G, Asnakew S, Ayele FY, Bariso Gare M, Mulu AT, et al. The role of C-reactive protein in predicting the severity of COVID-19 disease: a systematic review. SAGE Open Med. 2021;9:20503121211050755.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen W, Zheng KI, Liu S, Yan Z, Xu C, Qiao Z. Plasma CRP level is positively associated with the severity of COVID-19. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2020;19(1):18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Antonanzas F, Juarez-Castello CA, Rodriguez-Ibeas R. Using point-of-care diagnostic testing for improved antibiotic prescription: an economic model. Health Econ Rev. 2021;11(1):29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Dózsa C, Horváth K, Cserni I, et al. Roadmap for large-scale implementation of point-of-care testing in primary care in Central and Eastern European countries: the Hungarian experience. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2022;23:e26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Chowell G, Viboud C, Simonsen L, Miller MA, Echevarría-Zuno S, González-León M, et al. Impact of antiviral treatment and hospital admission delay on risk of death associated with 2009 A/H1N1 pandemic influenza in Mexico. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Basile K, Kok J, Dwyer DE. Point-of-care diagnostics for respiratory viral infections. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2018;18(1):75–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tranche Iparraguirre S, Martín Álvarez R, Párraga Martinez I. El reto de la pandemia de la COVID-19 para la Atención primaria. Revista Clínica de Medicina de Familia. 2021;14:85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Health, SMo [Internet]. Press communication Available from: https://www.sanidad.gob.es/en/gabinete/notasPrensa.do?id=58372022 [.

  30. Spanish Health Ministry [Internet]. Primary Care Action Plan and Community 2022–2023. Available from: https://www.sanidad.gob.es/profesionales/excelencia/docs/Plan_de_Accion_de_Atencion_Primaria.pdf2022.

  31. Spanish Health Ministry [Internet]. Number of medical professionals working in the National Health System (SNS) in Primary Care, Hospital Care, Emergency Services (112/061) and Specialists in training, by autonomous community. Available from: https://www.sanidad.gob.es/estadEstudios/sanidadDatos/tablas/tabla13.htm2020

Download references

Acknowledgements

Javier Arranz and José Mª Molero from SEMFYC, Mª Teresa Jorge, Isabel Jimeno and Mª Amparo de la Poza from SEMG for their invaluable help in the dissemination of the survey to associates. Authors also express gratitude to Meisys (Madrid, Spain) for writing assistance.

Funding

This research was funded by Roche.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fundación iO, Calle Ortega y Gasset 60, 1D, Madrid, Spain

    Manuel Linares, Laura Santos Larregola & Joaquín Santos Galilea

  2. Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Madrid, Spain

    Manuel Linares

  3. Centro de Salud Buenos Aires, Madrid, Spain

    Pilar Galicia García de Yébenes

Authors
  1. Manuel Linares
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laura Santos Larregola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pilar Galicia García de Yébenes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Joaquín Santos Galilea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.M. and S.J. conceived of the presented idea. L.M. developed the theory and performed the computations, verified the analytical methods and supervised the findings of this work. L.M, S.J. S.L and G.P analyzed and discussed the results. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Linares.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects participating in this study. Ethics approval was not required for this study due to its survey-type methodology as stated by the Drug Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, as ethical approval for questionnaire-based surveys is not required in Spain.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Linares, M., Larregola, L.S., de Yébenes, P.G.G. et al. Primary care during COVID-19 pandemic - a survey to establish clinical needs and lessons learned in infectious respiratory diseases in Spain. BMC Prim. Care 24, 202 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12875-023-02160-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12875-023-02160-z

Keywords

BMC Primary Care

ISSN: 2731-4553

Contact us