Involving community pharmacists in interprofessional collaboration in primary care: a systematic review

BMC Primary Care

Table 3 Risk of bias assessment using ICROMS

Study	Dimension							Total score	Minimum score met (≥ 22)	Mandatory criteria met
Study	(1) Clear aims and justification	(2) Managing bias in sampling and between groups	(3) Managing bias in outcome measurement and blinding	(4) Managing bias in flow-up	(5) Managing bias in other study aspects	(6) Analytical rigour	(7) Managing bias in reporting/ethical considerations	Total score	Minimum score met (≥ 22)	Mandatory criteria met
Adler D. (2004) [42]	2	3	2	1	2	2	6	18	No	No
Carter B. (2009) [25]	2	3	6	4	2	2	9	28	Yes	No
Carter B. (2015) [26]	2	2	4	2	2	2	9	23	Yes	No
Carter B. (2018) [27]	2	4	3	4	2	2	9	26	Yes	No
Chen Z. (2013) [28]	2	3	6	2	2	2	8	25	Yes	No
Finley P. (2002) [39]	2	0	4	0	2	2	5	15	No	No
Finley P. (2003) [40]	2	4	5	0	2	2	7	22	Yes	No
Heisler M. (2012) [29]	2	4	4	5	2	2	7	26	Yes	No
Hogg W. (2009) [30]	2	4	6	0	2	2	7	23	Yes	Yes
Jameson J. (2010) [31]	2	4	6	5	2	2	8	29	Yes	Yes
Lenaghan E. (2007) [41]	2	4	6	6	2	0	6	26	Yes	Yes
Omran D. (2015) [32]	2	4	5	0	2	1	7	21	No	Yes
Pape G. (2011) [33]	2	4	6	0	2	2	8	24	Yes	Yes
Sellors J. (2003) [43]	2	4	4	4	2	2	7	25	Yes	No
Simpson S. (2011) [34]	2	4	6	6	2	2	9	31	Yes	Yes
Smith S. (2016) [35]	2	2	4	2	2	2	8	22	Yes	No
Tahaineh L. (2011) [36]	2	2	3	0	1	2	8	18	No	No
Tobari H. (2010) [37]	2	4	5	5	2	2	8	28	Yes	Yes
Weber C. (2010) [38]	2	2	6	6	2	2	7	27	Yes	No

ISSN: 2731-4553